First, in the nationality of New Hampshire debates
We appreciate, as a participatory democracy presidential contenders keep their last debate before the New Hampshire primary next Tuesday. If you’ve spent with us, you know that the Republican candidate completes its debate within the studio only a half-hour.
TOM Griffith, WMUR: That is correct. And our voters of New Hampshire in the political tradition that we have every four years, very seriously. And we hope that tonight, that the people of New Hampshire, people in their living rooms, the situation for issues, candidates and check their heads, then finally on Tuesday.
The debate, the rules much more similar to the previous one. During the next half-hour Judy and I will ask questions to candidates. Each candidate is also time to challenge another. And then, of course, the two men have shared their comments.
Woodruff: And now let us welcome the Democratic candidates: Vice President Al Gore and New Jersey, former Senator Bill Bradley.
Gentlemen, thank you both.
The first …
Bill Bradley (D), presidential candidate: thank you very much.
Woodruff: The first question to Mr. Gore.
Most people believe that you’re an honorable man, but when it comes to political elections your critics, including some Democrats say that almost everything to win, even invent, with advisers, whatever its reputation and does not just run a hard, but an important campaign temperament. Newspaper editorials in the New Hampshire and across the country blamed for distorting competition in Mr. Bradley’s record. Is it really necessary to win the nomination of your party?
Albert Gore, vice president of USA: Well, Judy, I am of course very Challenge your characterization. And there is nothing that I have said in this campaign, which mean in any way, temperament. I’ve never seen a negative personal attack against my opponents and I’ve never. I never mentioned his name or image to display an advertisement, and I have no plans.
Well, I think some people feel uncomfortable if the substance of critical positions, when temperamentvollen Free discussion on the content of the questions on the effects of the attacks. It’s not a negative attack to defend, if Senator Bradley Medicaid, replacement or purchase grants, as he prefers to call, limited to $ 150 per month per person.
It is not at all an exercise in democracy to defend, Medicare, and all say that independent analysts have indicated that, because of the baby boom, shortly before retirement, a doubling of the population receiving Medicare, we must begin Putting money in the trust fund.
Senator John McCain has the same position.
Woodruff: Well, Mr. Vice President, there were clearly many distortions of Mr. Bradley’s record. And I only mention two of them. It weighs, for example, that his plan for health care, the federal standards for care. It is not.
Number two, you are free to support, he has - while taking care of the pilot scheme, private school voucher programs - which he did, he had to siphon money from public education This is not the case.
Now, it was a question of disinformation, or you were just politically?
Gore: Well, Judy, I can not once again with your characterization. Federal implementation of standards of care at home, in the supply of money under the Medicaid program, more than two-thirds of all home care patients get as much as half of its money from Medicaid.
If the federal government said: “Look, you are meeting standards”, the only threat they have for the implementation of these standards is the forfeiture of money.
Now, on public school vouchers - Good private school, Senator Bradley, whenever it came to the Senate, the private school for good. It is quite good, there is a limited amount of money in the cities and towns for public schools, and if something about money and spend private schools, over time, it will result in that siphoning money away from public schools.